Pre-TGE warming, launch-day amplification and listing-ready X presence in one cycle. A pool of blue-tick crypto residents seeds the conversation around your token across the threads where your buyers, market-makers and listing reviewers already scroll.
Built for the window between pre-token and the first three months after listing. Three days from kickoff to first measurable impact. The same pool runs a 5-minute SLA on category news beats (exchange listings, CEX rumours, audit drops), so the seeded narrative becomes the lens for those moments.
Volume, voice diversity and timing: the three signals the X algorithm reads as a real category trend, and the same signals listing scoring teams check when they screen a project's socials.
Three weeks before TGE the pool moves into your sub-vertical. In-niche residents start posting takes about your category, then cross-engage so the cluster reads as organic.
Launch day, the wave hits. Every signal under human review, in top replies under category influencers and viral threads.
CEX rumour drops, audit lands, regulator moves. The pool reacts in five minutes, frames the news through your seeded narrative before generic takes take over.
Spec sheet for a launch-window cycle. The volume, SLA and activity mix sit above. Here is what makes the pool credible to a listing reviewer or a market-maker, and what you see back through the cycle.
Trading volume tends to follow social traction. Our averages from 200+ launch-window campaigns: +180% in average 7-day post-launch trading volume vs a comparable silent baseline, +24% holder retention during high-engagement weeks. The chart sketches the typical shape of the curve, not a single project.
Left: the kind of replies cheap shilling services and bot farms drop under every launch announcement. Right: one approved touch from the pool, drafted by an in-niche resident before publish through your Review queue.
Cumulative touches by beat, top performing residents, sentiment trend, share-of-voice movement and news-cycle response times. One reach number you can take to a market-maker call or a listing review.
Across 200+ launch-window campaigns we have run, a typical cycle delivers around 1.1M impressions and 12%+ engagement rate inside the threads where buyers actually compare. The aggregate signal is consistent: average trading volume jumps by 180% in the 7-day window after launch day. Below: one anonymised consumer launch from Q1 2026 we used as the working pattern. The same shape transfers to a TGE wave, with the conversion target switched to wallet-connects, claim-page visits or whitelist registrations.
How a 21-day NotPeople pool compares with the alternatives founders typically run when a TGE is on the calendar.
★ This is us NotPeople pool | KOL deal | Generic SMM agency | In-house social hire | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-TGE warm-up | 21 days of seeded daily presence | 1–2 day post burst around the date | 4–6 week setup, output usually scheduled | Ad hoc, depends on staffing |
| Volume per launch window | 5,000+ visible touches, 1.1M reach floor | 1–3 posts from one voice | ~200 scheduled posts, low engagement | Dozens of posts across one or two accounts |
| News-cycle response SLA | 5 minutes, queued and published | 12–24 hours, manual booking | 24–48 hours, content-calendar bound | Variable, depends on who is online |
| Listing-review signal package | Audit log delivered before the application | Not designed for it | Rarely structured, no signal pack | Ad hoc screenshots, no methodology |
| Account profile | 100+ blue-tick niche-aged residents | One authority voice with a followership | Mixed, often new handles | Brand voice only, no community accounts |
| Brand-safety mechanism | Brand card + per-touch human review | Trust the KOL | Agency-side approval, often slow | Internal process, varies by team |
| Entry price | $3K per launch window | $5K–$30K per single post | $5–15K/mo setup + ongoing | $200K+ per year fully loaded |
We would rather walk away from a launch we are wrong for than ship a campaign nobody is proud of. The two columns below help that conversation happen on the call.
Working definitions of the terms that show up in the launch brief, the spec sheet and the dashboard. Borrow these for your internal docs.
In-niche resident. A blue-tick X Premium account with two to five years of posting history in a single crypto sub-vertical (L1/L2, DeFi, DePIN, AI subnets, stables, RWA, memecoins). Not a fresh handle spun up for the launch. The age plus the niche pattern is the part that lets the resident's reply read as a normal slice of a normal feed, instead of as a coordinated drop. We do not run single-purpose accounts because they get flagged by listing scoring teams in the first pass and they do not survive the next account-quality sweep on X.
Pre-TGE warm-up. Three weeks is the practical floor for a clean warm-up before a TGE. The first week the pool moves into your sub-vertical and starts daily takes on your category. The second week residents cross-engage and the cluster signal starts reading as organic. The third week the warming converts into seeded conversation density that an algorithm and a holder both read as real category momentum. Anything shorter than three weeks is news-cycle work, not launch work, and we say so on the call.
Listing review. Most CEXs and launchpads score a project's socials during their review window. They look at four signals: follower count and growth rate, engagement rate across posts, mention density across category threads, and recent posting cadence. Thin signals on any of the four become a reason to delay the application, downgrade tier or ask for stronger market-making concessions. A 14 to 21 day pool cycle moves all four metrics into the band reviewers expect. We hand over an audit log the team attaches to the listing application instead of reverse-engineering it later.
The 5-minute SLA on news beats. When a category news beat lands (exchange listing for a competitor, audit drop, regulatory shift, hack post-mortem), the standing pool drafts and queues 8 to 18 touches inside five minutes. Each touch frames the news through your seeded narrative instead of through whatever generic take is winning the timeline that hour. The point is not to flood the feed. The point is that the first reframe a reader sees on a category news drop is yours, not someone else's, and that the reframe carries a recognisable voice.
Touch vs reach. A touch is one visible appearance of your project in a live conversation: an original post from a resident, a quote-tweet of a token announcement, a reply under a category influencer, a mention inside a trending thread. Reach is the cumulative impressions across all touches plus cross-engagements. We report both because touches measure the work and reach measures the surface, and a campaign that ships 4,000 touches into a dead niche is different from one that ships 4,000 touches inside a live category cluster. Both numbers go on the weekly review.
The Review loop. Every reply a resident drafts in the first week lands in a queue for your team with full thread context, the trigger that fired and the resident's proposed copy. Most teams approve over 90% of items once the brand card is calibrated, usually inside 7 to 10 days. The loop is not there to slow the pool down. It is there to make brand safety on thousands of monthly touches operationally achievable without a 24/7 review desk on your side. After week two, teams usually move to a weekly batch review of edge-case items only.
Brand card. The single document that gates resident output. It defines tone, on-brand talking points, do-not-touch topics (price predictions, KOL beef, named competitors, regulatory speculation), how to handle FUD inside a thread, and the legal posture for your sub-vertical. Updated monthly with the team. The brand card is the difference between a pool that reads as a coordinated drop and a pool that reads as a normal slice of category conversation, and most onboarding time goes into getting it right rather than into ramping touch volume.
The first 72 hours of a cycle. Setup happens fast. Day one is brand-card intake with the team: tone, banned topics, current narrative posture, legal redlines for your sub-vertical. Day two is resident matching against your category cluster; we pull the right 30 to 50 voices out of the pool and confirm none of them have run for an adjacent competitor in the prior 90 days. Day three the pool starts daily takes on your category without naming you yet, so the residents read as natural slices of the niche when you do enter on day four or five.
Reporting by beat, not by total. We break weekly reach and touches into three beats so the team can see where the volume actually landed. Warm beats are seeded category takes ahead of the date. Launch beats are direct project mentions inside the TGE window. Catch beats are news-cycle responses inside that same window. A campaign that landed 4,000 touches all on launch beats and zero on warm beats looks healthy in total but tells you the room was never warmed. Two beats with under-performing volume usually mean the brand card or the resident match needs tuning before the next cycle.
Vertical-specific calibration. A DeFi protocol launch and a memecoin launch use the same pool but very different brand cards. DeFi cards skew toward mechanism explanation, risk framing and on-chain receipts; the residents trade in technical language and link out to docs. Memecoin cards skew toward narrative density, cashtag rhythm and meme-native responses; technical detail gets ignored. AI subnet and DePIN launches sit closer to DeFi but with hardware or model-quality vocabulary layered in. We have a template per vertical that the team tunes on day one, instead of trying to write a generic launch script that lands nowhere.
Live X replies drive the launch-day spike. Reddit holds the long-term category index. The Influencer gives the authority take when buyers want a name. LinkedIn covers the institutional layer.